SMHcoders FZ LLC · Abu Dhabi · Industrial software +971 52 991 9203Sales@SMHcoders.com
Products/02/ReviewMate
PilotEPC · Engineering QA

Engineering review, with the clause on every comment.

Drawings, P&IDs and 2D CAD checked against the standards you already enforce. Each finding cites the clause and the page it came from, and is verified against the drawing before it becomes a comment. Resubmissions are re-reviewed against the open comments.

REVIEWMATE · 02Pilot
Objective

Shorten the review cycle without lowering the bar: the model drafts the comments, an engineer signs them, and nothing is raised that cannot be traced to a clause.

InputsPDF · P&ID · 2D CAD
StandardsYour specs, compiled
ModelsSelf-hosted, open-weight
DeploymentFully on-premise
01/ LiveInteractive · runs in your browser

Rev A raised four. Rev B closed three.

Switch revisions. Each pin is a comment with its clause; click one to see the evidence the verifier required before it was allowed to stand.

  • Every comment links clause and page
  • Re-review tracks open, closed and new
  • Illustrative drawing — not a client document
02/ WatchProduct film · illustrative data

See a review end to end.

Three and a half minutes: from the requirement register to a signed comment, on an illustrative drawing set.

03/ WorkflowBefore and after

The same review, without the loop.

Today a non-compliant document travels to the company reviewers before anyone finds out. With ReviewMate it is checked against the approved requirements first, and every reviewer comment is checked before it goes back to the contractor.

Document review workflow with ReviewMate: EPC contractor, ReviewMate checks, company review Document review workflow today: EPC contractor and company review

Tap the chart to open it full size

04/ CapabilitiesEPC · Engineering QA
01
Requirement register, not training

Standards are compiled into an engineer-approved register of checkable requirements. The model is never trained on your documents.

02
Deterministic where it can be

Rules that can be computed — sizes, ratings, counts — are checked in code. The model handles only the clauses that need judgement.

03
Verified before it is raised

A finding becomes a comment only if the tag exists on the drawing and the quoted clause is found on the cited page.

04
Resubmission re-review

Rev B is checked against the open comments on Rev A — closed, still open, or newly introduced.

05
Comment resolution sheet

Output in the CRS format document control already uses, plus a chat over the drawing set.

06
Air-gapped by design

Runs on your hardware with open-weight models. Drawings and standards never leave the site.

05/ Workflow

Five gates between a drawing and a comment

The model is one gate of five. The other four are there so that its output can be signed.

Step 01Compile

Engineers approve the requirement register built from the standard.

Step 02Extract

Tags, lines and attributes are read from the drawing.

Step 03Check

Rules in code; judgement clauses by the model, with tools.

Step 04Verify

Tag must exist, quote must be on the cited page.

Step 05Issue

Comments to CRS; re-review on resubmission.

06/ EvidenceFrom the delivery record
100%
Comments clause-cited

No clause, no comment — unverifiable findings are dropped.

3/4
Closed on resubmission

Demo: Rev B closes three of four open comments; the fourth stays open.

0
Bytes leave site

Open-weight models on your own GPU.

CRS
Output format

Comment resolution sheet, ready for document control.

Proof of concept · your data

See it on your plant.