P&IDs from engineering intent, not drafting days.
A guided questionnaire in, a template-compliant DXF out — in minutes. Pipe sizing, valve sizing and pump-head workbooks drive what is drawn, not just how it looks.
Prove that a standard process P&ID can be produced from engineering intent rather than drafted by hand.
Answer the questions. Watch the drawing change.
A toy version of the questionnaire. Toggle ESD and HIPPS, change the tank count — the P&ID re-lays itself out, the way the generator does from its component graph.
- Topology comes from answers, not templates
- Symbols follow ISA-5.1 conventions
- Simplified for the browser — the real tool writes DXF
Generated from a component graph, or from a static template with automated line-size and line-number rewriting.
Pipe sizing, valve sizing and pump-head workbooks decide what is drawn.
Client symbols uploaded and mapped wherever the standard block differs.
DXF plus PDF, with border, legend, notes table and project details applied automatically.
An installed Windows application with an embedded runtime — no Python on the engineer's laptop.
Four steps from questionnaire to issued drawing
Answers drive a component graph; the graph drives the drawing.
Project and case created, unit system selected.
Client symbols uploaded and mapped.
ESD, mixer, HIPPS, tank count, line sizes.
Laid out automatically, title block applied.
From inlet manifolds to storage.
Opens in the CAD tools drafters already use.
Per drawing, once the questionnaire is answered.
Proof of concept accepted on the reference configuration.